Hey there, Last week, someone shared this with me: It resonated because she captured the exact catch-22 so many people face: Here's the thing about meetingsMany meetings favor one communication style: think out loud, jump in fast, speak over others to be heard. If that's not how you naturally communicate - if you prefer to think before speaking, or you like to listen and understand the full context before sharing your perspective - you're already at a disadvantage. It's not that one style is better than the other. And that's especially problematic when we're making data decisions that require careful analysis, not just quick reactions. The real problem isn't youIf you've ever felt like you're "bragging" when you try to share your work - you're not alone. If you've walked out of meetings frustrated because the right questions never got asked - I get it. If you've watched someone take credit for your approach while you sat there not knowing how to speak up - been there too. The problem isn't that you're not assertive enough. The problem is that most workplace communication assumes everyone thinks out loud. What actually works (without changing who you are)Here are some ways I've seen work for people who are not very vocal in meetings (but have a lot of invaluable ideas to share): 1. Set expectations upfrontBefore you start sharing, say something like: "I have three key points about this analysis. The first one is..." This tells people you're not done after one sentence. It buys you speaking time. 2. Use the "pause and continue" techniqueWhen someone interrupts (and they will), pause. Let them finish briefly. Then say: "Let me finish that thought" and continue where you left off. It feels awkward at first. But it works. 3. Be direct but politeI learned to say: "I'd like to complete my thought. Please let me finish and I'll pass it over to you." Yes, it's uncomfortable in the beginning. But it builds confidence each time you do it. 4. Create your own segueWhen the conversation moves on but you still need to share your point, try:
Lead with the problem you solvedWhen you do get the floor, start with what matters to them:
Be strategic about collaboration creditMany of us work in teams, and many of us do collaborate on projects. However, we need to be strategic about the communication so that our contributions don't get lost in the shuffle. Use "we" for collaborative efforts, but claim your specific contribution. For example: You're not being arrogant. The reality checkI'm not going to promise these strategies will fix broken meeting culture overnight. They won't. Some people will still interrupt. But what these approaches will do is give you practical ways to ensure your thoughtful insights get heard - without requiring you to become a different person. Your measured and careful approach is valuable, even if it doesn't always feel that way. The goal isn't to become louder. It's to become more strategic about when and how you share your insights. Your turnWhat's your go-to strategy when someone interrupts you? Or are you still figuring that part out? Hit reply and let me know. I read every response, and your experiences help me understand what's really happening in conference rooms everywhere. P.S.This whole "getting recognized for your actual contributions" thing is exactly what I cover in my 5-Day Professional Visibility Guide. If you haven't grabbed it yet, you can sign up here. It's designed specifically for data professionals who want recognition without the self-promotion headaches. And speaking of building systems that actually work... I'm putting together something for data professionals who've tried to create a digital product before but got stuck somewhere along the way. It's called Build to Sell: 7 Days to Create Your First Data Product. If you've ever thought about packaging your expertise but didn't know where to start (or how to actually finish), this might be exactly what you need. The waitlist is open here - more details coming soon. Talk soon, |
Join 5K+ subscribers who receive weekly, bite-sized, practical and actionable lessons for the data professional. | Free video tutorials at youtube.com/sqlbelle | Teaching data? Incorporate AI - tips and prompts at https://teachdatawithai.substack.com/
You know the signs: glazed eyes during your presentation, people checking phones while you explain a process, or the dreaded interruption - ”Sorry, but why does this matter to me?” It happens because we lead with how things work instead of what breaks when they don’t. We assume people want to understand the process when they really want to understand the consequences. The Gap Between Data Professionals and Everyone Else Here’s what usually happens: you spend time crafting a clear technical...
You know that feeling when you show someone your analysis and… nothing happens? The numbers are solid. Your work is spot-on. Everything makes perfect sense. But somehow your ideas just sit there. Nobody's acting on it. Most of the time, this is the reason: data doesn’t convince people - understanding how people think does. The Situation The analysts whose recommendations actually get implemented aren’t always the ones with the fanciest techniques or the cleanest data. They’re the ones who...
Hello there, Quick question: Have you ever designed a metric that created exactly the opposite behavior you wanted? If you’re nodding, you’ve discovered Goodhart's Law in action: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." This suggests the fundamental truth about human nature: As soon as people know a number is being watched or used to make decisions, they start optimizing for that number - often at the expense of what it was meant to represent. Here’s why this matters...